11/11/2023 0 Comments Ken wilber spiral dynamicsUpward movement only takes place according to the hierarchical structure of the spiral and levels are therefore not skipped. It is a soft hierarchy and growth may involve a person or group temporarily moving down on the hierarchy in response to a particular trauma or challenge, before transcending previously inadequate worldviews. The SD model is hierarchically organised and consecutive levels both incorporate and transcend preceding orientations. A sense of flow results from the match between the person’s orientation and the contextual requirements. The level of consciousness associated with each of these value systems, provides a perceptual framework, type of “intelligence” and worldview by which experiences are interpreted and responded to. For purposes of clarity,Wilber recommended the use of the word “value system” as proposed by Graves. According to Wilber (2001), a “meme” can be seen as a stage of development that is expressed in behaviour. The term meme was originally introduced by Dawkins to refer to a unit of cultural information. Beck and Cowan (1996), for example, extended the “value systems” language of Graves with the notion of “value memes”. ![]() The SD model, as adopted and applied by other authors, has undergone a number of conceptual changes. The levels are not to be seen as fixed, but represent flowing waves, continuously overlapping with, and interweaving, each other.Ī detailed explanation of the SD model can be found in Beck and Cowan’s “Spiral Dynamics Theory” (1996) and Cowan &Todorovic’s (2008) work. Each stage allows for the possible further development of “higher” stages or levels. These adaptive responses can be grouped into value systems which permeate the culture of groups, organisations and individuals. Wilber also points out that subsequent research has validated and refined the ECLET or SD model.Īccording to Graves,humans respond to life conditions by developing certain adaptive views and capacities which he refers to as “levels of human existence”. The Spiral Dynamics model of Graves, also referred to as the Emergent Cyclical Levels of Existence Theory (ECLET),provides a profound and elegant system in terms of which human development can be understood (Wilber, 2001). From Consciousness models in action: comparisons Graves’s Spiral Dynamics (SD) Model ![]() The role of consciousness theory in complementing current leadership models and practices is explored in terms of an integral perspective of leadership. Additional views from the spiritual and physical domains are referred to in support of the general themes that characterise speculations on consciousness. These models are, however, included in the final integrated framework as proposed in this paper (section 3). Psychological perspectives such as Loevinger’s model of ego-states Maslow’s need hierarchy and Kegan’s equilibrium stages are mentioned but not discussed in any detail. The views of educationalists Perry and Kohlberg are briefly discussed under the heading of intellectual, moral and ethical development (section 2.4). Gebser’s and Piaget’s work is merely addressed in support of Wilber’s AQAL model. These models have emerged from different study fields including philosophy, physics, sociology, psychology, economics and theology, and address consciousness, cognitive, moral, educational, physiological and spiritual development.Īll the models that are mentioned in this paper are not discussed in detail, and the focus is primarily on the contributions of Graves, Wilber, May and Myss. The various theoretical models on the evolution of consciousness reflect common themes, principles and structures. These levels of consciousness largely determine intellectual, emotional and behavioural aspects of human functioning. It reflects levels of awareness, or the inclusiveness,extensiveness, the depth and breadth by which incoming information is interpreted. In this paper, the construct of ”levels of consciousness”as used in psychology and consciousness theory, is closely linked to those of worldviews, perceptual frameworks, organising systems, value orientations, “intelligences” or “memes”, in terms of which people understand and respond to their worlds. Hurtak’s model of spiritual development.Atmananda’s model of spiritual development. ![]() Kegan’s model of psychological development.Loevinger’s model of ego-state development.Perry’s model of intellectual and ethical development.Piaget’s model of cognitive development.Gebser’s Structures of human consciousness.May’s model of development of consciousness.Levels of Human Psychological Development in Integral Spiral Dynamicsįrom Consciousness models in action: comparisons
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |